Art Forms From The Ocean: The Radiolarian Atlas Of 1862

Book Description

At the nexus of art and science, this dazzling new edition of Ernst Haeckel's first work reintroduces the genius of an enigmatic scientist and passionate observer of the natural world.

Although original editions of this book are extremely rare, it is now available for the first time in paperback, beautifully reproducing his drawings and watercolors. While the variety and detail of Haeckel's drawings display an impressive understanding of biological structure, the skill with which Haeckel drew these tiny aquatic protozoa renders them genuine works of art. This volume features commentary and descriptions of each of the radiolarians from Haeckel's work.

Customer Reviews:

Amazing and Little Known Organisms Illustrated.......2006-03-24

Radiolarians are a total blank to the majority of people, yet these remarkable builders of glass houses (microscopic to be sure) abound in the world's oceans. Ernst Haeckel, the Nineteenth Century German biologist and supporter of Darwin, wrote the most comprehensive monograph on the group in his Radiolarian Atlas of 1862, which is still in use today. The illustrations have never been surpassed and so it is certainly a boon for microscopists that the plates have now been republished in all their glory as "Art Forms from the Ocean: The Radiolarian Atlas of 1862". In many ways I wish that the text would have included descriptions of the radiolarians illustrated and their distributions, but that probably would have been of little interest to the general public. Instead there is a discussion of Haeckel's life and work, especially of his involvement with radiolarians and other microscopic marine life.

Still, for the price this is a real bargain, and I thus recommend this book just for the plates to any amateur or professional biologist who is interested in the micro planktonic organisms of the ocean.

Average customer rating:
Guide to Basic Information Sources in the Visual Arts (Information resources series)

Manufacturer: ABC-Clio Ltd
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Instructional & How-To | Arts & Photography | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0874362784

Average customer rating:
Guide to Basic Information Sources in Visual Arts
Gerd Muehsam
Manufacturer: Van Nostrand Reinhold
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: 0442212003

Average customer rating:
Guide to Basic Information Services in the Visual Arts
G. Muehsam
Manufacturer: ABC-Clio Inc
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: 0873462785

Book Description

A compendium of the most outrageous real-life lawsuits ever concocted by greedy, legal minds. This book hilariously demonstrates techniques for cashing in, in court, and boasts the funniest legal jokes, most outrageous lawyer license plates, a legalese dictionary, and, of course, a caseload of comical lawsuits.

Customer Reviews:

Spilled coffee? How about a spilled milkshake! Hillarious book!!.......2006-09-17

Thought you've heard all the best lawyer jokes and examples of frivolous lawsuits? Not until you've read this book! We've all heard about the lawsuit over spilled coffee a million times, but Percelay tells us about others -- like a lawsuit over a spilled milkshake -- that'll leave you laughing out loud. Not only well-written, this book has hillarious graphics that add a lot to the stories. This is a book lawyers AND non-lawyers will find highly amusing.

Corporate Propaganda & Lies.......2003-10-23

Such utter BS. These folks have been circulating this trash for years. This is just the efforts of big corporations to scare you into giving up your right to jury trial-- the only defense you have against them

The truth is that the corporations these people front for are clogging the courts with dumb lawsuits, not the poor injured people who the courts were designed for.

Don't buy this book. Toss your money in the street instead. Google 'Dumb Corporate Lawsuits' for the real deal on this issue.

All Star.......2001-01-31

This is one funny book -- both graphically and in the clever way it's written. Cases like the suit against M&M's for not including a peanut in one of their chocolate morsels had me laughing out loud. The book also shows diagrams (tongue in cheek, I hope) on how to create your own frivolous lawsuits. Who ever thinks America is not overlawyered needs only to read the first chapter of "WHIPLAASH!" I bought this after seeing the author featured on the game show "To Tell The Truth." I recommend this book, but don't sue me if you disagree. David Leiter

More Bad Humor.......2001-01-02

This is not a funny book. Even if it were truthful, which it isn't, the humor is poor. I am reminded of Senator Bob Dole's unsuccessful bid for President and his mantra against so-called "frivolous" lawsuits. The case of the spilled McDonald's cup of coffee appeared to fit the bill.

Oops! McDonald's heated the coffee to such a high temperature that the person who spilled it ended up burning her genitalia. Really funny? I don't think so. This plaintiff and her lawyer sued only for medical expenses, but the jury awarded her one million dollars anyway, a classic case of jury nullification and a slap on the wrist for McDonald's, who lost about an hour's worth of coffee sales, sniff, sniff.

This book is stupid and wants its readers to be stupid, too, by finding humor at the expense of the injured and by seducing readers into buying into the anti-trial lawyer myth of "frivolous" lawsuits. Sounds like Republican party propaganda designed to turn helpless consumers against themselves in order to buy special interest votes.

By the way, I am not a lawyer, I like Senator John McCain and other Republicans, and I am sorry someone bought me this book for Christmas.

Even A Lawyer Can Enjoy This!.......2000-11-20

This book proves that truth is stranger than fiction. Some of this stuff just couldn't be invented. The authors have done an incredible job coming up with examples of bizarre legal claims, almost all of which apparently were either ultimately dismissed or dropped, I might add. I guess our legal system is working just fine, though I doubt that was the point of the book.

Whiplash!: America's Most Frivolous Lawsuits

Average customer rating:

Whiplash!: America's Most Frivolous Lawsuits
James; Deutchman, Jeremy Percelay
Manufacturer: Andrews McMeel Pub
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000NXXZCE

Book Description

An authoritative source for biographies and discographies of hundreds of Native artists, providing an overview of the surprising abundance of recorded Native music while underlining its historical value. With almost 1,800 entries spanning over 100 years, this book leads readers from early performers of traditional songs like William Horncloud to artists of the new millennium such as Zotigh. It also includes film soundtracks and compilation albums that have been instrumental in bringing many artists to popular attention. With unprecedented breadth of coverage and extensively cross-referenced, it is an essential guide for enthusiasts and collectors.

Book Description

Exploring relationships between politics, the people and social change, this book assesses the fortunes mainly of Labor, but also of the Communist Party and the New Left in postwar Britain. Using concepts like political culture, it looks at the left's articulation of "affluence": consumerism, youth culture, America, TV, advertising and its disappointment at the people under the impact of such changes. It also examines party organization, socialist thinking and the use of new communication techniques like TV, advertising and opinion polling.

Book Description

This volume is a cooperative venture to make generally available the results of intensive research and thought over many years at half a dozen leading university research centers. The conceptual and statistical analysis of the major general attributes of labor mobility by Philip M. Hauser provides an effective background for the interpretation of the subsequent essays. The principal findings of a series of pioneering studies are presented by Gladys L. Palmer, Charles A. Myers, and Dale Yoder. Impediments to labor mobility are discussed by Clark Kerr and important interpretations of certain crucial problems relating to the future flexibilty of the American economy are discussed. These considerations, and others, are summarized in challenging fashion by E. Wight Bakke.

Labor Mobility and Population in Agriculture:

Average customer rating:

Labor Mobility and Population in Agriculture:
Ames. Center for Agricultural and Economic Adjustment Iowa. State University of Science and Technology
Manufacturer: Greenwood Press Reprint
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Job Hunting & Careers | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Job Markets & Advice | Job Hunting & Careers | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Labor & Industrial Relations | Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Book Description

This is the report of a conference called in 1960 to analyze the problem of labor supply in, and its transfer from, the agricultural industry.

Discussion paper - [Program on the Role of Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development]

Average customer rating:

Discussion paper - [Program on the Role of Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development]
Niles M Hansen
Manufacturer: University of Texas and University of Kentucky
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding
ASIN: B0007ECLWO

Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity by Bakke, E. Wight; Hauser

Average customer rating:

Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity by Bakke, E. Wight; Hauser
E. Wight Bakke; Philip M. Hauser; Gladys L. Palmer; Charles A. Myers; Dale Yoder; Clark Kerr; Paul Webbink
Manufacturer: The MIT Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OQ9LYG

Welfare reform and opportunity in the low-wage labor market (Opportunity in America)

Average customer rating:

Welfare reform and opportunity in the low-wage labor market (Opportunity in America)
Daniel P McMurrer
Manufacturer: Urban Institute
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding

Labor & Industrial Relations | Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Customer Reviews:

Awesome book for the clueless Dad to Be.......2006-06-19

I found this book at a 2nd-hand store and bought it for my husband. It's a great book about the ups and downs of pregnancy that's great for the dad to be. Unlike the 4000 books for the mom-to-be, this one deals with some of the clinical symptoms of pregnancy in a humourous fashion, and explains what his wife is going through, and how he can best help.

As the pregnant wife, I highly recommend this book for new Dads who just aren't sure what their pregnant spouse is going through.

Book Description

Ever since the guns of Gettysburg fell silent, and Lincoln delivered his famous two-minute speech four months after the battle, the story of this three-day conflict has become an American legend. We remember Gettysburg as, perhaps, the biggest, bloodiest, and most important battle ever fought-the defining conflict in American history. But how much truth is behind the legend? In These Honored Dead, Thomas A. Desjardin, a prominent Civil War historian and a perceptive cultural observer, demonstrates how flawed our knowledge of this enormous event has become, and why. He examines how Americans, for seven score years, have shaped, used, altered, and sanctified our national memory, fashioning the story of Gettysburg as a reflection of, and testimony to, our culture and our nation.

Customer Reviews:

Gettysburg, History, and Meaning.......2006-05-03

The Battle of Gettysburg (July 1 -- July 3, 1863) was the largest battle fought in North America and a pivotal event of the American Civil War. The battle, its causes, environs, personalities, events, among other things have been written about and memorialized endlessly, literally from the moment the troops on both sides left the battlefield.

In his study "These Honored Dead", Thomas Desjardin examines some of the the legends that have grown around this great battle. He has written a historiography which shows how and why it is difficult to determine what in fact occured during the battle from the mass of conflicting accounts in the literature. Desjardin holds a PhD in American history. He is the author of "Stand Firm Ye Boys from Maine" which examines the activities of the 20th Maine and Colonel Joshua Chamberlain on Little Round Top during the Battle of Gettysburg.

Desjardin offers several reasons contributing the the difficulty of separating fact from memory in understanding a complex historical event such as the Battle of Gettysburg. First, during the battle, the participants were under, obviously, severe stress and tend to focus only on the activities under their direct observation. With the passage of years, memories tend both to fade and to become embellished.

Second, after the battle many of the participants tried to shape the story for ends and meanings of their own. Thus Union General Dan Sickles tried to destroy the reputation of General Meade, the Union commander at Gettysburg, to cover Sickles's own misdeeds in moving his Third Corps to an exposed position which threatened the Federal position and resulted in great loss of life. Similarly, various Confederate writers, including General Jubal Early, tried to find scapegoats for the loss of the battle to foster a "Lost Cause" mythology and absolve General Robert E. Lee from blame for the defeat.

Third, Gettysburg has become regarded as a key moment in understanding and giving meaning to the American experience. Historians, artists, and the public have shaped the meaning and events of the battle to meet perceived national and frequently individual ends.

Desjardins examines a number of key moments of the battle, including the fighting for Little Round Top at the extreme left of the Union line on July 2 and "Pickett's Charge" at the center of the Union line on July 3. A great deal of mythology has grown around these two moments. With respect to Little Round Top, Desjardins examines the bases for some of the claims put forth about Joshua Chamberlain and Gouverneur Warren, among others, and concludes that a number of the claims are extravagant, unsupported by, and in some cases contradicted by the historical record. Desjardin discusses in some detail Michael Sharaa's famous novel, "The Killer Angels" and the television series and movie based upon it and shows the fictitious character of much of the account.

A work such as Desjardin's could easily degenerate into an exercise in debunking, which is all-to-common in understanding American history. But I found Desjardin's book moving and instructive precisely because this does not happen. Desjardin discusses a battle and a battlefield that have a great deal of historical and personal resonance for him, and he takes it seriously. Gettysburg may not be, indeed, an American Valhalla, but the site is hallowed ground and it, and its combatants, have earned the study, memorializations, and legends they have received. Taking away some of the legends about Chamberlain or Warren, for example, we are left with highly impressive individuals and with incidents of heroism. Upon completing the book, I was left with the feeling that, in Gettyburg as in so much else, the truth and the search for the truth about what took place, are more impressive and shape the legends. The battle, its consequences, and meanings are properly ways in which Americans discover themselves.

Readers who enjoy this book will also benefit from many other studies about the relationship between history and memory at Gettysburg. An example of such a book is Carol Reardon's "Pickett's Charge in History and Memory" (1997). Desjardin's book will have its greatest appeal to readers who have a background in the Battle of Gettysburg and an interest in questions of historical truth and interpretation.

Robin Friedman

Separating Fact From Fiction.......2005-01-06

My first thought was "Oh no! Another book about the Battle of Gettysburg." As a resident of the bustling tourist town and frequent battlefield "stomper" I decided to give it a go.
From Thomas Desjardin's introduction, to the very end, he dispells many of the myths about the Battle of Gettysburg, many myths that are still told today. Desjardin reveals how history and memory often conflict and how many of the battlefield legends came to be. A refreshing look at a much written about topic!

No ideological ax.......2004-06-25

It was refreshing to read a Civil War book by an author with no ideological ax to grind. Desjardins raises some of the fundamental historical and historiographical questions in trying to determine: " How do we know what we know?"
Obviously, using Gettysburg as the centerpiece for discussion, but branching into " Lost Cause" critiques, Desjardins has produced an entertaining, often humorous, an ultimately valuable assessment of the many myths that surround Civil War discussion.
Perhaps the most striking and revealing commentary deals with how the tradition of Gettysburg worship and celebration evolved, and how the controversial selection and placing of monuments transpired.
Although some of the probing covers previously analyzed terrain, the author brings a new angle, and thankfully, non-ideological viewpoint to the topics. An enjoyable, and informative read from cover to cover.

Adequate but hardly inspired........2004-06-25

Listened to the audio version.

Have to admit that my interest in this was sparked by "The Killer Angels"--wanting to know how much was fact or fiction. And I must also agree with the reviewer who thought this book desperately needed an editor.

You might compare this book to a Senior Thesis...long on words and shorter than you'd like on fact and substance. But then, I came to this book wanting the arguments, wanting the sources and an evaluation of them. Not a simple, terse statement that a source was unreliable followed by an entire dismissal of anything to do with the tainted source. (Disregarding some sources would be ignoring as much truth as fiction.)

I was especially interested in the issues and history surrounding some of the accounts of Col. Chamberlain and the defence of Little Round Top. But I wanted to know what the likely truth was, not just what the author thought was suspect. And I had a hard time believing that many of the details the author wanted to discuss (like the kind of hat someone might have worn or whether there was a Buster Kilrain) were important enough to put in a book. And most readers aren't that worried about the exact spot where someone might have died.

If this book was directed to a general audience, it often failed to raise issues sufficiently meaty to merit any hype. If it was directed to an audience of specialists or buffs, they would be disappointed by the lack of detail and documentation.

Desjardins seems to take his audience for fools, typically portraying the worst examples of ignorance, vapid credulity, and mercenary exploits connected with Gettysburg. No thinking person assumes everything happened just as it's portrayed in a movie. I can make up my mind about various myths just fine. I just wanted information to work from and I was quite content when I got it.

Just my perspective. There was definitely some worthwhile material. I think the author was reflecting more of his background in the park than is useful for a wide audience...most of us don't care too much when or how certain monuments were put in place, though some of the machinations behind them were interesting. And I think he erred unhappily on the side of talking around some of the real debates so as not to become embroiled in them. But it isn't really a waste of time. What I want to know is what the battle means to the author. Was it significant or not, and in what way? Just curious!

Insightful.......2004-06-08

The author raises some very good questions and points. His focus does drift away from Gburg from time to time and covers more of the myths of the overall war.

The book is actually somewhat heart breaking for us students of the ACW because you walk away realizing that many of the accounts of the war you may have read are not necessarily entirely factual. Again, the point of the book is to explore the myths and in doing so the author asks many questions. Unfortunately there are not many answers, although many of the key points are put to rest (i.e. Gburg for shoes, "Historicus", etc.)

There was something missing from the book that doesn't allow me to give it a better rating, and I'm not quite sure what it is. It is a little scatter brained and redundant at certain points. Another pass from an editor would have helped. There is also a somewhat half-assed attempted to psycho analyze some of the motivation behind the embellishments/straight out lying, etc. that was a bit elementary, and quite frankly presumptuous. But most of all, I think the book needs to be re-organized. There should have been a "top ten" of sorts, myth #1 Shoes, myth #2 Ewell controversy, myth #3 Longstreet controversy, myth #4 Sicles controversy, etc. I have the feeling that the book was on the short side, and things were added and restated to beef it up. The writing almost would have worked better as a series of articles in a ACW or history mag.

That being said, it is very insightful and for that it gets my 3/maybe 3.5 star rating. Not for the novice, I think you are better reading a treatment of the battle, at least to help you understand why men would lie/exaggerate their reports. The biggest surprise of course is the heroic stand of the 20th Maine which gets toned down to realistic proportions and brings Chamberlin back to earth.

In short, good reading overall, but could use the touch of a better editor, and less preaching.

THESE HONORED DEAD. How the Story of Gettysburg Shaped American Memory.

Average customer rating:

THESE HONORED DEAD. How the Story of Gettysburg Shaped American Memory.
Thomas. Desjardin
Manufacturer: Da Capo Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OSY4JG

Amazon.com

Conservative talk radio host, lawyer, and frequent National Review contributor Mark R. Levin comes out firing against the United States Supreme Court in Men in Black, accusing the institution of corrupting the ideals of America's founding fathers. The court, in Levin's estimation, pursues an ideology-based activist agenda that oversteps its authority within the government. Levin examines several decisions in the court's history to illustrate his point, beginning with the landmark Marbury v. Madison case, wherein the court granted itself the power to declare acts of the other branches of government unconstitutional. He devotes later chapters to other key cases culminating in modern issues such as same-sex marriage and the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill. Like effective attorneys do, Levin packs in copious research material and delivers his points with tremendous vigor, excoriating the justices for instances where he feels strict constit utional constructivism gave way to biased interpretation. But Levin's definition of "activism" seems inconsistent. In the case of McCain-Feingold, the court declined to rule on a bill already passed by congress and signed by the president, but Levin, who thinks the bill violates the First Amendment, still accuses them of activism even when they were actually passive. To his talk-radio listeners, Levin's hard-charging style and dire warnings of the court's direction will strike a resonant tone of alarm, though the hyperbole may be a bit off-putting to the uninitiated. As an attack on the vagaries of decisions rendered by the Supreme Court and on some current justices, Men in Black scores points and will likely lead sympathetic juries to conviction. --John Moe

Book Description

Mark Levin throws the book at our own judicial system--in particular, American judges who ignore the Constitution and dismantle the rights of American citizens in everyday court proceedings. He shares jaw-dropping examples of judicial power grabs and liberal power plays by judges.

Customer Reviews:

Are we simply sheep being led astray?.......2007-09-19

The first thing I would suggest doing before reading this book or any other political book is to actually read the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. It can be found for free on the internet.

When discussing one of my favorite issues of our time, the interaction of government and religion, invariably the phrase of "Separation of Church and State" is put forth. My simple retort is to then challenge the individual to find that phrase in the U.S. Constitution. It's my belief that if you asked the entire population of the United States, 80 - 90% of the people would say that phrase could be found in the Constitution. But alas, those words can be found nowhere in the Constitution or the first amendment specifically. It isn't all that surprising that people hold that belief based on the fact that the phrase is uttered ad nauseam through the media, politicians and judges. This simple fact alone leads me to suggest actually reading the entire document before moving on to books regarding the Constitution.

The above being said, whether you are a middle of the roader, left wing loony or a right wing nut job like me I think Mr. Levin's Men in Black is a valuable read. It gives accounts on how the judiciary has usurped power that isn't specifically given it in the Constitution.

For people that applaud judicial activism such as Roe v. Wade, rulings against religious activities, etc. they should take pause and consider that someday the result may be widespread judicial activism from the right. Neither being a good thing. Legislating belongs in Congress where politicians are accountable to the people by election. To me Mr. Levin shows the danger of when judges take power not given them in the Constitution and use it to get their personally desired results enacted.

The book is specifically broken out in chapters that discuss specific topics, such as role of religion, rights to privacy, social policy enacted from the bench as well as several others. While I felt the arguments could have at times been better developed, I do believe this is a valuable book to read to gain a better understanding of our current judiciary climate and how we got to this stage.

Courts out of control .......2007-09-13

The constitution, federal law, and American culture dictate in the most extreme manner that the power of the government belongs to the people through their elected ombudsmen in Congress.

The US Supreme Court took it upon themselves to state what the law says, and where the power is to be held, which is not what the founders or the constitution clearly states. In fact it is up to the court to police themselves and define where their power is and where it is not, just look at Marbury vs. Madison.

The power of government belongs to the citizens of the United States through the honestly elected congressionals, not to a bunch of elitist left wing thugs who have the OVER privilege to sit on the bench and decide how we the people should live.

Court decisions like Roe vs. Wade were completely unconstitutional where the court erroneously cited the right to privacy where the Constitution itself says nothing about abortion and thus the document left the issue and other social issues to be independently decided by state governments and state voters, not some liberal elitist thugs in Washington.

American power belongs to the people themselves through direct voter participation, elected congressional figures, and the honorably elected executive in the White House when it comes to issues of Terrorism and national emergency in the 21st century.

Issues such as Miranda rights, Map Verses Ohio, Roe vs. Wade, and other unjust rulings should be decided by state voters, state legislatures, and sovereign state governments not a bunch of elites in the Federal government.

The states have a large amount of power, and should have that power over numerous social and legal issues; Federal power is granted through the consent of the states, not the other way around.

The jaws of the American Supreme Court must be defanged, their power must be checked, and judges on all levels of the law should be held accountable to the people.

The law serves the people; the people do not serve the left wing elitist snobs who took it upon themselves to declare that they are the law.

America must remain democratic, constitutionally republican, and free for all time.

God bless the USA.

Finally the TRUE story of what has been going on in the Supreme Court.......2007-08-28

I was shocked to read the real story of what has been going on in the Supreme Court all these years. Thanks to Mark Levin to bring it out in the open.

This made the best sellers list?.......2007-08-19

Wow. I guess the way to the best sellers list is to: 1. ignore logical consistency; 2. ignore competing arguments; 3. distort history; 4. bash your opponents with heat, but no light. What a formula. For those interested in a serious work about the same themes, take a look at Kermit Roosevelt's book on Judicial Activism.

Supreme Court is SUPREME POWER....scary...........2007-05-31

The antics of the Supreme Court (Supreme God ?) were quite eye opening, and who better to tell the story.....

Our population needs to start marching in front of the court building and making our opinions known.

This book points out the problems when people are appointed for life and then have NO ACCOUNTABILITY.

The detail about the cases cited and researched is amazing....the facts are scary, but important for everyone in America to understand that the Court can and does regularly take away in some way every liberty we think we posess.

A must reading......I highly recommend it.

4 Books - 1) - Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest of Us) / 2) - Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America / 3- Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters,.. / 4- Who's Looking Out for You? (Unboxed Set of Books)

Average customer rating:

4 Books - 1) - Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest of Us) / 2) - Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America / 3- Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters,.. / 4- Who's Looking Out for You? (Unboxed Set of Books)
Mona Sharen , Mark R. Levin , John Stossel , John Stossell , and Bill O'Reilly
Manufacturer: various
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000WHQG6I

Product Description

4 Books - 1) - Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest of Us) / 2) - Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America / 3- Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters,.. / 4- Who's Looking Out for You?, in either Hard or Softcover, (See Seller Condition Comments), Shipped in one package to save on shipping costs.

Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America.(Book Review): An article from: Defense Counsel Journal

Average customer rating:

Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America.(Book Review): An article from: Defense Counsel Journal
William A. Wick
Manufacturer: Thomson Gale
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Defense Counsel Journal, published by Thomson Gale on January 1, 2006. The length of the article is 5092 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America.(Book Review)
Author: William A. Wick
Publication: Defense Counsel Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2006
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 73 Issue: 1 Page: 82(9)

Article Type: Book Review

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Product Description

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books