Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion

Amazon.com

Science, in the abstract, is supposed to be nonpolitical, even to transcend politics entirely. In truth, though, science is always conditioned by political reality--and by money.

So writes journalist Daniel Greenberg in this wide-ranging indictment of the way in which science is conducted in the United States. Although funding for scientific research has been readily available since the end of World War II, he maintains, research bureaucrats have transformed the enterprise into "a clever, well-financed claimant for money" and the successful quest for that funding into a condition of employment and advancement. Given that climate, Greenberg suggests, basic research has suffered, so that many diseases go unconquered, while more politically glamorous investigations are rewarded. Increasingly corporatized--industry, he writes, accounts for two-thirds of all research and development dollars spent, and its "profit-seeking values" are radiating throughout the culture--scientific research is insufficiently policed and criticized, watched over only by the inmates. In the rush for funding, Greenberg argues, science becomes increasingly subject to ethical lapses, with scientists too easily endorsing dubious causes such as the so-called Star Wars missile-defense system and too readily putting human subjects in danger.

Greenberg's arguments are broad but well supported, and his book is sure to excite controversy within the scientific community. Lay readers, however, will also find it of much interest. --Gregory McNamee

Book Description

Each year, Congress appropriates billions of dollars for scientific research. In this book, veteran science reporter Daniel S. Greenberg takes us behind closed doors to show us who gets it, and why. What he reveals is startling: an overlooked world of false claims, pork, and cronyism, where science, money, and politics all manipulate one another.

Customer Reviews:

tons of converstions but..........2006-01-10

Daniel Greenberg, a Washington-based journalist, analogizes the American scientific activities after WWII as a metropolis dominated with academic cultures in its core. In contrast to the general conception that the budget for the basic research has been cut since the "golden age," or 1960s, the financial support to science enterprises actually has increased. He argues that the problems in the American science have not come from a deficiency of money but from a self-ghettoized, apolitical scientific enterprise of science itself which only competes for the public money but is ignorant of social consequences of what it does. He suggested more political involvement and enlightenment in the scientific communities as a prescription.

Recent study shows that there is a room for even the "self-ghettoized," "apolitical" enterprises of science, as called by the author, to be admitted to be raised as "the fifth branch" (Jasanoff, 1990) which bridges science and policy through the scientific advisory board. Although tons of conversational examples were presented in the book, many questions remain still ambiguous: for example, how political ignorance was gauged; to what other enterprises it can be compared (if possible); how the political ignorance negatively affected public welfare.

I admire the author's effort to incorporate all the transient newspaper articles and volatile dialogues among the congressmen and the heads of various scientific institutions into a 500 paged book. To read Introduction and Epilogue seems enough for this book, unless you have a plenty of time or historian-like interests in the episodes occurred in the Washington regarding the research policy and budgeting.

Best of Four Books That Blend Together Nicely.......2005-10-19

This is the best of the four books I chose to look into this topic, easily the most comprehensive and balanced, with a strong ethical component; it shows how the competition for money, rather than scientific progress, is diverting scarce resources and frustrating needed advances.

It does not, however, provide a complete picture. Three other books are helpful:

The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney is the book that is the most compelling on the perversions of the extremist Republicans (I am a moderate Republican). Read this first or last, depending on your disposition.

Frontier of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress by Daniel Sarewitz, is an excellent counterpart to Greenberg as well as the other two books If science is corrupt on the one hand, it is also over-sold on the other, a point that Sarewitz addresses very methodically.

Finally, Investing in Innovation, edited by Lewis Bramscomb and James Keller, brings together a range of views crossing the environment within which scientific research takes place, evaluationg specific programs and policy tools, and making recommendations (all of which have been ignored by the current Bush Administration).

I take three bottom lines from these four books together:

1) We are spending too much on military science & research.

2) Neither Congress nor the Executive have a serious strategy for prioritizing problems, finding private sector partners, and providing seed money for innovative solutions.

3) Both Congress and the Executive, as well as the public and the media, are incredibly ignorant about what science can and cannot do, and where all the money is going to generally poor effect.

4) This is all so important that Science, like Intelligence, needs its own Supreme Court. I am persuaded we need a new form of hybid public agency that is fully independent of the Executive, receiving a percentage of the total disposable budget (say 3%) and hence not subject to Congression pressures.

If you buy only one book, buy this one--but you will be missing important alternative thoughts from the other three.

A Polemical Triumph.......2005-06-04

With a career's worth of insider observations, Greenberg reports on the modern reality of academic research and its bloated addiction to federal funding. As historically interesting as it is practically and morally discouraging, it should be required reading for all prospective graduate researchers. References are dissertation quality.

Keeping a rein on science.......2005-02-05

Washington investigative journalist Daniel Greenberg fills the 500 pages of this book with stories of how science puts material concerns ahead of ethical concerns, resulting in that which is not always in the best interests of society. Indeed, ethical erosion in science, with a corresponding abdication of social responsibility, seems to be inversely related to the chase for money. For many scientists, the pursuit of money has become the primary motivation, with concern for the moral and social good largely ignored.

Science can be funded from governments, from industry, and from universities. Of course those who supply the cash flow can determine the type of research and in many respects the outcome of the research. One just has to think of the enormous budget given over to AIDS research, while other less glamorous (and less politically correct) diseases go begging for funding.

The life sciences (medicine, biotechnology, pharmacology, etc.) is a good case in point. For example, pharmaceutical firms often misrepresent and inflate scientific data for regulatory approval, and to influence physicians to prescribe their products to an unwitting public. One way to achieve this end is to duplicate publication of experimental data to give the impression of widespread scientific backing.

Greenberg offers other examples of bad ethics in human experimentation, and notes how the biomedical research community was aware of gross inadequacies in monitoring scientific experimentation and quite content to let the situation remain that way. The examples demonstrate that what is done in the name of science often seems to be above regulation, accountability and ethical review.

And it is not just science that gets tainted with money and corporate influence, but knowledge as a whole. Thus corporate greed and the limitless pursuit of profit seem to negatively effect everyone within reach, and it is not scientific objectivity alone that suffers, but learning as well. No wonder why certain bioethical debates seems to be so one-sided. The recent stem cell debate is just one example where Big Biotech is buying its way into science and the media, regardless of the outcome for the rest of society.

And Greenberg notes how the popular press acts mainly as a puppet of science, especially biomedical research. It routinely pumps out what is told to, without asking the hard questions it does of politicians and others. This is indeed the case with reports of scientific-medical progress. Greenberg calls this "may" journalism. Stem cells may do this. Cloning may do that. Gene therapy may deliver the goods. We are wowed by reports of potential medical breakthroughs, but they are just that: potential. However, the way the media presents them, it seems like a cure for Parkinson's disease will arrive next week. Thus we find a collusion between certain scientists, various industries (eg., the Biotech industry), and a gullible and/or subservient media.

And of course this collusion acts as a giant feed-back loop. Journalists need good news stories, and scientists and the corporations need people to think they are just on the verge of a major medical breakthrough, if only a bit more funding were forthcoming. The one feeds of the other, and a disease-weary public, believing that immortality is just around the corner, will go along with it. And governments also get into the act, claiming that if we over-regulate things like cloning or stem cell research, all the research will move interstate or overseas, leaving them behind. So there is a grand mingling of state, corporate and public interests taking place, making it even harder for science to claim any sort of neutrality and objectivity.

If religious leaders and politicians today are subject to intense scrutiny and ethical appraisal (and rightly so), then perhaps it is time to extend the same treatment to scientists. And one place to begin is by reading this important and timely book.

Mix three volatile reactive elements and you get a mess.......2002-04-20

There are a couple of things about this work by Greenberg that struck me as significant, and added to the fact that the book is very well written, it makes for a very compelling read. Even after many years of scientific journalism and working within the industry Greenberg says that the scientific enterprise makes him "feel like a stranger in a strange land." This is no idle boast by someone trying to tout his credentials as an objective observer and skeptic. This is in fact precisely the perspective that Greenberg uses throughout; this arms-length approach allows him to come up with some rather perceptive insights and useful recommendations. The second point of interest, and something for which the scientific community should be commended, is that generally this book has been quite favorably received. Many times when an "outsider" reports on some subject, the first, and oftentimes the only point, aggrieved professionals focus on is that he's not an "expert", or he's a "non-specialist". That doesn't seem to be the case with most of the commentary on this book from the scientific community. And make no mistake, there's enough damning evidence here about the volatile mix of SCIENCE, MONEY, AND POLITICS and the resulting mess of "Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion", that it would be normal to expect self-defensive counter criticisms.

Greenberg traces the changing role of science and its relationship with politics, roughly since the period following WWII. Long gone is the era of the prominent presidential science advisors. Today it is money that dominates the scientific agenda. The chapter on the National Science Foundation (NSF) and its claim a few years ago that the country faced a shortage of tens of thousands of scientists is illustrative. Greenberg shows this lobbying effort for increased funds as a knowingly false issue pushed by a merger of institutional and academic interests. Greenberg quotes a US Office of Management & Budget Report which had this to say about scientists: "They are the quintessential special interest group..."

He has much to say on the inflated claims of many projects. Although he specifically mentions the aborted Superconducting Super Collider (SSC), it is clear he views more recent projects such as the Human Genome Project, and cloning, in the same light. Greenberg doesn't allow the book to end as a mere polemic though. He makes an interesting recommendation for the conversion of the NSF into a National Science, Engineering & Humanities Foundation. This is more in recognition of the need for a new "ethic" rather than as the desirability of conflating all knowledge to scientific methods as some scientists (E.O Wilson in CONSILIENCE) have recently called for.

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, published by Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc. on July 1, 2002. The length of the article is 1284 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Never enough money.(Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion) (book review)
Author: Michael S. Reidy
Publication: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Refereed)
Date: July 1, 2002
Publisher: Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc.
Volume: 58 Issue: 4 Page: 65(2)

Article Type: Book Review

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. (Return of the gadfly). (book review): An article from: Issues in Science and Technology

Average customer rating:

Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. (Return of the gadfly). (book review): An article from: Issues in Science and Technology
David M. Hart
Manufacturer: National Academy of Sciences
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

General | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Issues in Science and Technology, published by National Academy of Sciences on December 22, 2001. The length of the article is 1612 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. (Return of the gadfly). (book review)
Author: David M. Hart
Publication: Issues in Science and Technology (Refereed)
Date: December 22, 2001
Publisher: National Academy of Sciences
Volume: 18 Issue: 2 Page: 89(4)

Article Type: Book Review

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion

Average customer rating:

Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion
Daniel S. (Author) Greenberg
Manufacturer: University Of Chicago Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OOUYEE

Book Description

South Korea has recently come to the attention to global strategic planners. This report puts these executives on the fast track. Ten chapters provide: an overview of how to strategically access this important market, a discussion on economic fundamentals, marketing & distribution options, export and direct investment options, and full risk assessments (political, cultural, legal, human resources). Ample statistical benchmarks and comparative graphs are given.

Book Description

Offshore Basics: Features of a Special Business Area gives an overview about the most important features of offshore business. Additionally, it is the intention of the author to describe the most used offshore jurisdictions with their typical characteristics. Most chapters in this book are written with reference to United Kingdom companies and companies incorporated in offshore jurisdictions, which generally follow UK Company law.

Customer Reviews:

With one eye opened.......2000-05-16

I had to read and review this book until I finished it. I was up all night with one eye open. Starting your own business is one thing reading this book made some sense to it. Great find!

Start Your Own Childcare Business (Start Your Own Business)

Average customer rating:

Business wise
HORRIBLE
Not worth your time

Start Your Own Childcare Business (Start Your Own Business)
Prentice Hall
Manufacturer: Prentice Hall Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Entrepreneurship | Small Business & Entrepreneurship | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Small Business & Entrepreneurship | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

ASIN: 0136033253

Customer Reviews:

Business wise.......2003-03-01

The book was really good to put things in perspective of a business view. It had very little to say specifically about childcare but I thought the book was good enough to get some helpful information from it and pass it on to a friend who had nothing to do with childcare.

HORRIBLE.......2001-10-09

This author is clearly trying to make just a quick buck. I bought this book for me girlfriend because she is in the process of opening a child care center. This book is totally useless... DO NOT BUY IT

Not worth your time.......2000-03-12

This book was clearly created for any type of business start up and contains very general information about starting up a business. There are many parts of the book that are completely unrelated to childcare, as in packagine, sales tax and beleive it or not mail order and catalog businesses... There is some good information about things to do when starting up a business, but you can get this help from other books that also have more childcare specific inforamation.

Start Your Own Childcare Busin (Start your own)

Average customer rating:

Start Your Own Childcare Busin (Start your own)
Pfeiffer
Manufacturer: Prentice Hall & IBD
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | Small Business & Entrepreneurship | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Start Your Own Childcare Business (Start Your Own)

Average customer rating:

Start Your Own Childcare Business (Start Your Own)
Prentice-Hall Dawn Kilgore
Manufacturer: Prentice Hall Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OIZ38M

Book Description

1 cassette / 30 minutes
Read by the Author and a supporting cast

Feeling rushed, overwhelmed, out-of-control?   How to Manage Time and Set Priorities offers real solutions and easy-to-follow advice for organizing your life.

Whether at home, in the office, or at school, this proven program from expert author Stephen Young shows you how to save hours of time very day.  You'll learn how to set obtainable goals and objectives, avoid interruptions, reduce paperwork, and run effective meetings.

In addition, this AudioBook offers simple techniques to help you:
* stop wasting time
* avoid procrastination
* organize a daily schedule and stick with it
* set short term and long term goals
* accomplish complex tasks
* delegate with confidence

Stop putting it off, gain control today.   How to Manager Time and Set Priorities will show you how!

Average customer rating:

How to Manage Time and Set Priorities
Sound Editions
Manufacturer: Random House Audio
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Audio Cassette

General | Books on Cassette | Audiobooks | Formats | Books
ASIN: 0871886197
Release Date: 1987-01-05

Average customer rating:
Early labor force experiences and debt burden (Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports)
Susan P Choy
Manufacturer: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding
ASIN: 0160491797

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books